An Artwork of Ai Weiwei Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

An Artwork of Ai Weiwei - Essay ExampleI have detect that art pieces of Ai Weiwei seem to be confusing many affecters. Ai Weiwei artistic are gainsay because the artist uses nearly every object to represent unique features. Evidently, a number of his work tends to afford the viewers grappling to identify the meaning. For example, in one of his art piece, he has used an ordinary ride to produce a sterling art piece. Attempts towards interpreting the meaning of this piece often leaves the viewer thought process about the meaning of the ordinary piece of object used in nontextual matter. As noted by a number of art critics, the use of ordinary objects to produce unique art pieces sometimes grows difficulty in interpretation (Laar and Diepeveen 94). Largely, placing the artwork in any condition tends to be very difficult. I debate that this situation is evident with most art pieces of Ai Weiwei. The common nagging question that people date difficult is what the art piece repr esents when the meaning of the ordinary object has changed. While the viewers often bark to find the meaning of art pieces, many fail to think in terms of placing the artwork in a given context. Laar and Diepeveen have observed that some artwork that the audiences regard as difficult tends to qualify towards certain cultures (112). Arguably, interpreting art pieces designed to address a concern in the western countries capacity not have the same meaning in the Asian countries. Thus, in interpreting artwork, the viewer inescapably to understand the culture of the people where the artwork has emanated from. For instance, Ai Weiwei art pieces often confuse many viewers because they seem to address aspects of the Asian culture as well as western cultures. Arguably, a variety show of cultural aspects from different backgrounds whitethorn be difficult to interpret. First, by putting the artwork in a different cultural background, the viewer shall have lost the real meaning. Secondly, failure to recognize the background of the artwork will also make the interpretation difficult. In my view, interpreting the art pieces of Ai Weiwei requires understanding the context of his work. The difficulty in interpretation often arises when the situation that led to the creation of the artwork is unclear. In such cases, the viewer needs to know circumstances that surround the creation of the artwork. I think the vagueness in the intro is the failure of the viewer to identify the situations or circumstances that artists want to display. For example, artistic works which address policy-making issues may confuse a viewer who does not place the work in the right policy-making situation. I have realized that Ai Weiweis work which addresses the sorry state of the society tends to create controversy in interpretation. For example, Ai Weiweis painting, Ai Weiwei is missing in Taipei illustrates stools clamped together. The painting may be disturbing to interpret because it tends to project varied meaning. While in Ais view the painting illustrates his absence during the Taipei event, a viewer who does not have the right information power not think in that line.