.

Thursday, April 4, 2019

Rationale for concentrating on teaching of reading strategies

Rationale for concentrating on get a lineing of yarn strategiesBecoming a teacher is a complex subroutine of change and development not only in terms of conduct but also in cognition, affect and knowlight-emitting diodege (Calderhead, 1990). Moreover, as a language teacher, the importance of retentivity your language skills and classroom methods up to date is essential. Thus, attending an in-service study ladder may hold a significant key to solving a myriad of obstacles facing teachers development (Day, 1999 Craft, 2000 Sugrue, 2001 Hammadou, 2004 Lee, 2007).Why I chose this do for the workshop?Considering that teachers appear to be allergic to theory, especially when it is delivered in the lecture mode (Kouraogo, 1987, p.173), the workshop is intentional as a communicative interaction between the trainer and the teachers who argon supposed to act as students in a normal classroom environment.As Kouraogo(1987, p.173) importanttains teachers consistently ask for working tip s and ready-made uncommitted materials as soon as they return to their classrooms and it is the trainers intended . to show teachers how ineffective direction may come if learners are not taught explicitly how to use reading strategies to perform better.While subscribing to Hayes opinion that cultivation/development academic sessions should value participants existing knowledge, it is the role of the teacher trainer to make these theories explicit during the course (Wright, 1990, p. 92). In practice, this means that sessions should give participants an opportunity to talk or so their perceptions of the teaching- larn process, and provide guidance in understanding its notional underpinning.What am I aiming at in terms of teacher cognition and their instructional practice?The training programme is based on my belief that an awareness, knowledge and understanding of theoretical aspects of language and language nurture theory pull up stakes enhance the chances for the langu age teacher to adopt a more effective methodology and promote students effective learning .Similarly, Ellis (1986, p.92) emphasizes the idea thatthe practice of actual teaching can be alter by making teachers aware of the options open to them and the principles by which they can evaluate these alternatives.I assume that in-service teachers exist a certain level of comfort with the teaching strategies they check previously employed often for numerous years and see no real reason to alter them (Adams and Chen (1981). Therefore in-service training is a good opportunity to table service teachers reflect upon their teaching practices and make them aware of their teaching weaknesses and strengths. Upgrading teachers knowledge on the chosen exit as well as assessing and reviewing their own teaching role in the loose of changes in research is another aim of the teacher trainer.Why I chose the topic reading strategies?The main arguments in support of my choosing this topic for the training programme are manifold. Firstly, the scarcity of studies on investigating teachers beliefs in the area of second language reading instruction have indicated an unclear picture of teachers belief hit in teaching reading( Chou, 2008, p.192). However, making the teachers aware of their consequent instructional practices may reshape their knowledge about teaching reading and allingn their practice to the research.The second point is a practical one. The effectiveness of teaching reading is closely related to reading- related strategies and dodge-training. As (Singhal, 2001) suggests research in the area have found that strategy training leads to improved reading performance. Her view is reinforced by Wellingham (2007, p.39) who emphasizes that strategy instruction improves science. Therefore, the teachers role is to maximise the students potential reading ability by helping them use reading strategies so as they stupefy fluent and efficient readers.The third point is dete rmined by the context in which I teach and the target audience of the workshop. The question whether teachers develop reading skills in their classroom may be answered negatively if we consider the result of the questionnaire that I administered to my target audience.As a result, discovering the best methods and techniques for achieving fluent reading with equal to(predicate) comprehension, and identifying what techniques or processes the learners may use becomes a prerequisite of this workshop.Why I chose these activities?Taking into consideration that participants usually bring a wealth of ideas and experience to in-service sessions( Hayes, p.9) and the fact that it is an awareness raising session, the activities have been chosen to with the preceding(prenominal) mentioned reasons.Student teachers have a rich store of initial knowledge and beliefs aboutteaching and learning (Nisbett and Ross, 1980), and these beliefs aremainly shaped by their prior learning experiences (Lortie , 1975). In thepresent study, student teachers are conceptualised in this way, and thus itaimed to identify sources of their initial beliefsIn the first part of the session, participants are briefly introduced to the topic of theThen, they are invited to respond to some given texts and share ideas with their peers.Concept Mapping- Morine-Deshimer (1993), Artiles, Mostert, andTankersley (1994), and Winitzky and Kauchak (1995).It is the view of Armour-Thomas (1989) that teachers thought processes influence their judgements, decisions and practices. Therefore, attempting to exhibit teachers thoughts for elicitation of mental processes in research on teacher thinking are concept mapping. Choosing this method, will enable me to examine participants understanding of the topic and investigate the influences of particular components of a teacher education course on student teachers knowledge (Calderhead,1990).As well as this, it will be useful in revealing gaps, misconceptions, and the deg ree of sophistication of their conceptualisations.Presentation of the training programmeThis training programme consists of 6 coordinated theoretical and practical workshops to be attended by EFL/ ESL in-service teachers with a special interest in teaching reading, and who are willing to explore the potential benefits of exploring the reading process in more depth.Acquiring practical and theoretical skills will be taught in interactive and student-centred workshops, focussing on the participants personal input speckle attending the training session1.an introductory session to shed light on the reading process in L1 and L2 including types of reading, different theoretical approaches to teaching reading- 2 hours2. teaching and using effective reading strategies 2 hours3. understanding and evaluating reading teaching materials and their aims while focusing on selecting materials to motivate students and to improve their reading skills- 4 hours4.assessing reading and designing a read ing task- 4 hours5. a practical session which offers each participant the possibility of choosing a certain type of reading and to explore it in more depth in terms of efficient classroom activities or as Clair (1995) ironically emphasizes Give me stuff. Give me a discretion bag. You can use this with your fourth grade students who dont speak English. I will use it (p.191). 4 hours6. evaluation of the workshop and reflective feedback on teachers beliefs- 2 hoursPrior to attending the training programme, each teacher answered a questionnaire whose results will be used during the training sessions. In addition, the training programme will be led entirely by one trainer so as any changes in teachers beliefs can be observed and evaluated. At the end of the training programme, each participants will receive an observation sheet containing entropy about the changes he/she might undergo.Presentation of the workshop about teaching reading strategiesThe objectives of this two-hour train ing session are to improve the expertise of in-service EFL teachers in relation to teaching reading strategies and dissipate some of the misunderstandings that cramp effective and efficient classroom practice.Aims of the training sessionTo raise awareness of advantages and disadvantages of different types of reading strategiesTo help teachers begin to develop competentTo highlight the role of reading strategies training in reading comprehensionLearning outcomesAt the end of this session teachers are expectedTo distinguish between effective and ineffective reading strategiesTo select or identify the best reading strategies in order to help the learners murder language knowledgeTo decide on appropriate ways of encouraging effective readingshop outlineTaskActivityObjectiveDurationProcessMaterialsNotesWelcome, introduction, session outlineTo activate learners schemata5 minutesPowerpoint presentation- 1 slideExploring experienceproblem-solving activityTo reflect upon the use of readin g strategies5 minutescopies of textsConcept Mappingto examine the structure of studentteachers knowledge and to investigate the20 minutesParticipants are asked to brainstorm about reading strategies.After having produced a list of terms (i. e.concepts) they are then asked to redact them and demonstrate their connections,and on some occasions label what these relationships are. The concept mapeventually produced is thought to constitute participants understanding of thetopic.The doing of the activity and, implicitly the reflection on the process itself hopefullytriggered a certain make sense of learning.3-2-1 Strategy 3 things you learned 2 interesting things you discovered 1 question that you still haveTo review issues from the workshop and to get feedback from the activities20 minutesIndividual response to the taskTable set up 3-2-1Awareness raising

No comments:

Post a Comment